🔗 Share this article

In a recent appearance, star Jude Law stated he had no concerns about backlash for portraying Vladimir Putin in a new film. This production, however, could coincide so closely with the carefully constructed image promoted by Russian state media that, domestically, it reads as a endorsement rather than a challenge.

The Crafted Superhero

For years, the Kremlin and its pop-culture machine have worked together to forge a tailor-made version of the president. This figure is a political superhero devoid of flaws, a former spy reimagined as a Russian James Bond who consistently understands beyond what he shows.

“Domestically, the constructed Putin has long overshadowed the real one.”

Screen-Based Support

One recent example is a TV series released last October, directed by a Kremlin supporter. The protagonist is a fictional security officer selected by fate to “save” the nation from chaos. Although the character's name Mikhail, the message is unmistakable: the savior must be a familiar security officer.

International depictions often end up reinforcing this same narrative instead of undercutting it. An adaptation based on a bestselling satirical novel sets out to undermine the Putin cult by framing him not as a cause but as a symptom, shifting the focus to the spin doctors surrounding him.

The Myth of the Reluctant Leader

On screen, the president is presented as having been picked by influential figures to steady the country because he is “young, athletic and a spy”. They visit him and all but beg him to become president. He replies is that he would prefer to rule from the shadows, desiring enduring influence.

This tale is a key piece of state propaganda: the cool, reluctant strategist shaped by destiny. Historically, these events took place.

The Truth Behind the Selection

Nobody ever begged Putin to take the job. The position was effectively a selection process with many candidates. At the centre to the selection stood a powerful businessman from the Yeltsin era who planned to control the state de facto.

• His list featured several politicians, among them a reformer later murdered and a former spy chief.
• According to a journalist who studied Putin’s biography, the future president simply fitted the necessary criteria: loyal, from the security services, and not a communist or a liberal.
• A property developer familiar with the events said the key criterion was controllability and faithfulness, not leadership.

“They didn’t need a strong candidate, they needed someone controllable, someone who would obey orders.”

Building the 007 Persona

Experts agree that the image of Putin as a powerful KGB spy was built after the fact. Stories about his “recruitment work” in Dresden do not stand up to scrutiny. Fundamentally, he handled paperwork and technical tasks, a low-level clerk not involved with actual agent work.

Curiously, the move to depicting him as a “spy” may in part have been triggered by Daniel Craig’s debut as 007. The grittier version led local outlets and online audiences to make comparisons with Putin. Edited images replacing Craig’s face with Putin’s appeared on city centers, fueling the growing tendency to frame him as a Russian 007.

A Diplomatic Opportunity?

With Jude Law, an actor popular with Russian audiences, the Kremlin are likely to seize the opportunity to frame his casting as a small victory. The film's omission of mass protests, the opposition, or key figures from its narrative, even though it includes the past decade, is a welcome aspect for official messaging.

In Russian cinema, Putin is frequently an all-powerful presence who remains unseen on screen. He is hinted at through portraits or orders from on high. In this new film, he at last gets a recognizable face—one that may inadvertently validate the very myths it might seek to examine.